Rereading a favorite book

bridge-sighs-book-coverRecently my book group read Bridge of Sighs by Richard Russo, a book I had savored more than a year ago. But a year later, with the complications of aging and excess information crowding my brain, I had almost completely forgotten the novel. What I did remember was my reaction to Bridge of Sighs — joy and admiration.

I decided to reread the book. Initially, I thought I would skim through the novel and its contents would all come back to me. But once again I became caught in Russo’s magic spell — his masterful prose, his complex plotting and his insightful characterizations.  I ended up slowing myself down to reread Bridge of Sighs almost as if I were reading it for the first time. 

On a second reading I did have a little more distance and was able to step outside the book and watch the author at work. I could see how he simultaneously seduces the reader while skillfully delivering his significant themes.

Despite the close examination a second reading entails, Bridge of Sighs remains a great read and continues to be one of my all-time favorites. And I am very excited that Russo has a new book coming out on August 4, That Old Cape Magic. Reserve it now!

I have a question for Shelf Talk readers. Would you rather read a new book or reread a favorite? Which favorite book might you like to reread? I know my candidates for rereading — the two middles:  Middlemarch and Middlesex.  ~ Susan F., Fiction Department

10 responses to “Rereading a favorite book”

  1. I’m not much of a re-reader, although I have re-read Crime & Punishment, The Brothers Karamozov, and a few others (and always feel a bit insufferable mentioning that). And in fact, intend to go back and do it again – Karamozov, anyway, and Ulysses. Middlemarch would be a great one to revisit. Maybe that is a feature of always having felt there was so very much more that I needed to read, and having piles of things I’ve meant to read, that I (wrongly) treat re-reading as a waste of time.
    I certainly talk with lots of very happy re-readers here at the library, though, who think nothing of revisiting a favorite book each and every year, or reading through an entire mystery series for the third time.
    Then there’s re-reading things you loved as a child – I’ve done some of that, with very mixed results. I’ll never forget the sad deflation I had when I decided to do Tolkien again, only to find that the magic was somehow gone. Robinson Crusoe, however, was completely different from how I’d remembered it.
    For those who are interested, there’s at least one book about this – re-reading – by Wendy Lesser – called “Nothing Remains the Same: rereading and remembering.”

  2. Kara P.

    I’m not much of a re-reader…actually the only thing I re-read are my journals I’ve written in since I was 10. Although I adore my previously read books that sit on my bookshelves and will sometimes find myself touching their pages or their cover I love the excitement of a new read. Everytime a book fills a hold its really like getting a gift. Especially with favorite authors when a new book of theirs comes out I can hardly wait!

  3. Linda J.

    I don’t like to re-read books, but, coincidentally, I have been thinking of re-reading Middlesex.

  4. I make a point of re-reading at least one book a year and I usually find the writing just as enjoyable. Occasionally, usually with a book I haven’t read for a long time, I’ll find myself puzzling over just why I was so taken with it. For example, last year I re-read Walker Percy’s The Last Gentleman, which at 27 (and recently divorced) I found pleasantly acidic. At 44 (and happily married) I found the whole experience a little sour.

  5. I almost never re-read a book. There are too many good books left that I need to read before I die, to say nothing of the ones that have not yet been written.

    One exception is the 19th century children’s classic “Little Women” by Louisa May Alcott. I’ve probably read it at least 4 times, and I’ve watched the three best known versions of the movie (1933, 1949, and the recent one in 1994) many times as well. I keep hoping Beth (played by Jean Parker, Margaret O’brien, and Claire Danes, respectively) won’t die. My name is Beth, and “Little Women” was my mother’s favorite book too.

  6. Heather

    I re-read constantly. I wake up in the middle of the night with a favorite bit of scenery or dialog running in my brain and I have to re-read the book. Although only with certain authors. Jane Austen, Terry Pratchett. I have 35 boxes of books in my garage that I haven’t been able to get to since 1999 and I find myself buying new copies of things I know I own but that I want to re-read. Being a re-reader doesn’t stop me from reading new material. I judge the size of a purse by how many paperbacks it will hold! If only I didn’t get carsick on buses.

  7. “I judge the size of a purse by how many paperbacks it will hold!”

    Me, too!!!

  8. Generally, re-reading something doesn’t seem worth the time when there are so many great books I haven’t even read once. That said, I did re-read my favorite, The Sot-Weed Factor, and loved it only slightly less than the first time. David, your comment about Tolkien is funny. I managed to sneak through my teens, twenties, and most of my thirties before I got around to The Lord of the Rings and I have to say, it didn’t do much for me. In fact, my interest level petered out by the end of The Two Towers and I never bothered to read the last one!

  9. David W

    There’s a great piece on re-reading by David Gates, I think, in this week’s Newsweek.

  10. […] Found in a reader’s comment to a Seattle Public Library blogpost. […]

Leave a Comment

Discover more from Shelf Talk

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading