Extreme Makeover: Picture Book Characters Edition

While I am out and about on the bookmobile, visiting preschools and child care centers, I come across interesting changes that happen to children’s picture book characters. Sometimes there will be subtle differences when a new illustrator takes over an old series:    

                                                 

Sometimes an existing book gets completely revised by a different illustrator, which can alter the mood of a book:

                        

… And occasionally causes a family to switch species altogether:

                     

What I always find the most interesting is when an illustrator changes a character over time.  This can be a subtle bunny lift and jowl reduction:  

                               

… Or the taming of a little critter:

       

The most drastic example of this is everyone’s favorite anxious aardvark, Arthur.  Marc Brown’s first Arthur book was Arthur’s Nose (1976), where an aardvark named Arthur is unhappy with his nose, considers a nose job and decides, of course, that he likes his own nose best after all. 

In the book Arthur’s Eyes (1979), in which he gets glasses, he has lost about a third of his nose length:          

               

Today’s Arthur definitely changed his mind about the plastic surgery and decided to get some pretty serious work done.  His head is ovoid, his ears are rounder, and the only evidence that he even has a nose is two little commas for nostrils.  To make things a bit more confusing, the publisher reissued Arthur’s Eyes with the furry, snouted 1979 Arthur inside, but a new cover that shows the current Arthur.

Have you noticed any interesting changes to any of your favorite children’s book characters?  How would you explain to kids why Arthur looks so different in his older books?

                                ~ Robin, Mobile Services

17 responses to “Extreme Makeover: Picture Book Characters Edition”

  1. Gerard Saylor

    He’s an aardvark? I always wondered what he was.

  2. That’s amazing! I may not be crazy for feeling disoriented when a parent shows me a book I thought I knew and it seems totally different than I remember it being. Thank you.

  3. Not to be too politically incorrect, but I always felt that Arthur was sort of the Michael Jackson of children’s book characters. Exactly, Gerard – “He’s an aardvark?” The irony that his career started with a book about accepting your appearance and god-given attributes is just too much! Thanks for this post.

  4. That’s amazing and a little sad. Not everything needs a makeover. Oh, well. It makes for an excellent topic of discussion. Thank you for sharing!

  5. This is so funny- It’s sort of like the horrible movie out-take covers that publishers always feel they must put on one’s favorite novel so that readers “get” the movie tie in.

  6. What a fabulous post Robin!

  7. Carol Levin

    I heard once (not sure if this is true or anecdotal) that Arthur’s nose was shortened in the second book (Arthur’s Eyes) because the original was just too difficult to draw straight on (as would be needed for eyeglasses)…practical but extremely ironic given the first book’s theme!

  8. Mary Ferris

    When I was at a conference, I heard Marc Brown talk about this change in Arthur. He said it was hard to show different emotions in the character when his nose was so long – he always looked sad! That’s why he softened the image and shortened the snout. We’ve all changed in the past 35 years – maybe aardvarks just get better with age!

  9. The first book, Arthur’s Nose, is the reason why I argued with my husband so adamantly that he was an anteater at first. He looks like neither now and I always forget what animal he’s supposed to be. I still love Arthur though, even with all his plastic surgery.

  10. Sarah — Through the comedy of the English language, when I first read your comment I thought you were arguing adamantly that your HUSBAND was an anteater! (I’ve seen distinguished gentlemen who might fit that bill. Beak. Nose.)

  11. Loved the illustrations in the first two Mooki books… don’t know why they changed illustrators so drastically:
    http://www.amazon.com/Kari-Smalley-Gibson/e/B001HOTCGG/ref=ntt_athr_dp_pel_1

  12. Oh dear. and Lynn Sweat told me he tried so hard to duplicate Fritz Siebel’s illustrations style. (which the remaining makovers you show didn’t.) It was in his contract when he took over after Fritz died.

    I also heard that the more recent makeover was because that final Arthur was the easiest to produce for the Television show.

  13. Patrick Holt

    I’m not a youth svcs librarian, so I may be missing something, but is there anything wrong with just explaining that the illustrations were drawn differently through time and/or by different people?

  14. Where’s the fun in that, Patrick? (Relax: we’re just joking around)

  15. Forget the nose–the little dude has gone from brown to white! Now, that’s disturbing.

  16. […] Public Library blog, and one of the nicest of its kind that I’ve seen) have come out with Extreme Makeover: Picture Book Characters Edition.  And amongst their characters is Marc Brown’s Arthur.  As one commenter to the […]

  17. […] Shelf Talk This entry was posted in Publishing News. Bookmark the permalink. ← Presentation at YALSA’s “Teens 3.0″ “Mom on a Nutrition Mission” Postponed → […]

Leave a Reply to AZCancel reply

Discover more from Shelf Talk

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading